“Julius Robert Oppenheimer was born on April 22, 1904, in New York City to a wealthy German-Jewish immigrant family. Often called the "father of the atomic bomb" for his role in the Manhattan Project, he was a brilliant theoretical physicist who led the Los Alamos Laboratory.”

Look up Oppenheimer along with the phrase “in modern times” and you’ll see commentary on the cryptic answer he gave a student who asked if “Trinity” (the name he chose for the atomic bomb test in the New Mexico desert in July 1945) was the FIRST atomic bomb test. “Oppenheimer supposedly told a student the Trinity test was not the first atomic bomb in history, but only the ‘first in modern times.’” All the quantum physicists of that era learned and studied Sanskrit, and knew full well there are CLEAR descriptions of atomic weapons being used in ancient India.

Then there is the name “Trinity” which is a tongue in cheek reference to the two German atomic bomb tests in 1944… and the fact that the US didn’t feel the need to test the uranium version of “the bomb” because it was a gift from Germany which they had already tested. A gift, one among many, made in a secret deal arranged by Allen Dulles and finalized by Harry Truman - that allowed for the fake deaths and very real escapes of the highest Nazi leaders to Argentina with American protection.

I know this goes against the propaganda historical narrative we were taught in school… But it’s the reality I uncovered when I did enough research. And I’m not the first. Critical Mass, Forgotten Creators, Grey Wolf, Hitler in Argentina, and plenty of other good books came before mine. But I combined the best info from all sources and am very happy with how my books turned out. If you want to learn the truth in detail on the German and American atomic bomb programs, or the secret deal Germany made with the United States near the end of WWII, read Oppenheimer and Heisenberg

and - Hiding Hitler: The Offer America Couldn’t Refuse

(Coincidentally, Hitler also escaped Berlin on the night of April 22 [1945] flying to Austria, then near Barcelona, eventually leaving Spain by submarine for Argentina.)

Springtime - late April in particular - would be a time, once upon a time, when Hitler would have celebrated. His birthday was April 20, and he escaped the Soviet invasion of Berlin the night of April 22-23. By April 26 he was safely in Spain, and before long, in Argentina - where along with several other officially dead top Nazis, they enjoyed a long life.

If you haven’t researched this topic, and you’re American, the idea that Hitler escaped goes against everything you were ever taught and must seem as unlikely as Elvis and Bigfoot knocking at your front door. But in South America, the opposite is true. Everyone knows Hitler made it to Argentina, and it isn’t controversial at all.

The truth is - Germany was far ahead of the rest of the world in several aspects of physics. They made the first atomic bombs, (but lacked the air superiority to deliver them to targets like Moscow) and that wasn’t even their most important breakthrough. The United States’ greatest conquest in WWII was acquiring Germany’s intelligence networks intact, as they were paid to keep working against the communists - their atomic bombs, and their special research projects, many of which are still secret today. The price was allowing Hitler, Bormann, and several other Nazi leaders to escape - with US support authenticating their ruse and covering their trail.

If you are interested in the facts on this topic read Hiding Hitler

The sad truth. In 1990s, Stanford researcher Dr. Robert Sapolsky discovered something that should have broken the internet by now.

He was studying dopamine pathways in primates and found that the brain doesn’t just adapt to repeated stimulation. It actively fights back.

When you flood dopamine receptors consistently, the brain deploys what neuroscientists call “opponent processes.” For every artificial high you create, your nervous system generates an equal and opposite neurochemical low. Not eventually. Immediately. The system is designed to maintain balance, so it starts producing compounds that directly counteract dopamine while you’re still experiencing the dopamine hit.

This means every notification, every scroll, every digital reward doesn’t just give you a high followed by a return to baseline. It gives you a high followed by a crash below baseline. You end up in neurochemical debt.

Tech companies never publicized this research. They probably never read it. They were too busy discovering that variable ratio reinforcement schedules could keep users engaged for hours. They built addictive systems by accident, then refined them into addiction machines once they realized what they’d stumbled onto.

Your phone delivers an average of 80 dopamine hits per day. Your ancestors got maybe 5. Each hit triggers opponent processes that create a corresponding low. By the end of a typical day of normal phone usage, your baseline dopamine is running in negative territory. You feel flat, restless, vaguely unsatisfied, and hungry for stimulation because your brain chemistry is literally below zero.

You think you’re bored. You’re chemically depressed by artificial highs.

The opponent process theory explains why nothing feels interesting anymore. Your brain isn’t broken. It’s precisely calibrated to maintain neurochemical balance, and you keep throwing that balance off with artificial intensity. Every Instagram hit requires an equal Instagram crash. Every TikTok high gets paid for with a TikTok low. Every notification rush gets balanced with notification emptiness. Your reward system is running a neurochemical deficit that grows larger every day.

Sapolsky’s research revealed something even more disturbing: opponent processes don’t just create temporary lows. They become permanent changes to your baseline dopamine production. Chronic overstimulation doesn’t just make you tolerant to digital rewards. It makes you insensitive to natural rewards.

The sunset that would have captivated your great-grandfather becomes invisible to you not because sunsets got worse, but because your dopamine system needs intensity levels that sunsets can’t provide. A good conversation becomes boring not because conversations got less interesting, but because your brain requires the rapid-fire stimulation of social media to register engagement.

You’ve accidentally trained your reward system to ignore everything that isn’t artificially amplified.

This connects to research from Dr. Anna Lembke at Stanford, who found that people who undergo complete digital fasting for just 30 days show measurable increases in dopamine receptor density. Their brains literally regrow sensitivity to natural rewards. Food tastes better. Music sounds more complex. Social interactions become genuinely engaging again.

But there’s a catch that nobody talks about: the first two weeks of dopamine detox feel like clinical depression. Your brain has been chemically dependent on artificial stimulation for years. Removing that stimulation creates actual withdrawal symptoms. Restlessness, anxiety, inability to focus, emotional flatness, and desperate cravings for digital input.

Most people interpret these symptoms as evidence that they need their phones. Actually, they’re evidence that they’ve been neurochemically dependent on their phones without realizing it.

The withdrawal period isn’t a bug. It’s proof the reset is working.

What happens after week three is remarkable. Colors become more vivid. Conversations become genuinely absorbing. Simple pleasures like hot coffee or cool air become satisfying in ways you forgot were possible. Your brain rediscovers that reality contains enough complexity and beauty to hold your attention without artificial amplification.

You don’t need more interesting content. You need more sensitive reward systems. The solution isn’t better apps or more engaging entertainment. The solution is restoring your brain’s factory settings for what constitutes a worthwhile experience.

Sapolsky’s opponent process research suggests this can happen faster than anyone expected. Every day you don’t artificially spike your dopamine, your baseline moves a little higher. Every natural reward you pay attention to rebuilds receptor density. Every moment of boredom you endure without reaching for stimulation strengthens your capacity for sustained focus.

Ancient humans lived in a world that provided exactly the right amount of stimulation to keep their reward systems healthy. Enough challenge to stay engaged, enough calm to stay balanced, enough novelty to stay curious, enough routine to stay stable.

We built a world that provides 10 times too much stimulation and wonder why nothing feels rewarding anymore. Your brain is not the problem. Your environment is the problem. Change the environment, and the brain heals itself automatically.

You know what to do to fix this. Put the phone down early and get to sleep. Go outside and exercise regularly. Eat healthy foods. Read a good book. Set and accomplish goals. Life improves and the process makes doing these things get easier over time.

You may have 10 or 20 years, but major problems will come up years before the end. If you don’t pick a good location and develop the right skills and community and mindset, supplies alone won’t save you. Watch some of Ben’s videos. And read some good books like

“The United Kingdom is standing at a historical crossroads, but according to one of its most respected military veterans, the path ahead leads directly to internal armed conflict. Retired Colonel Richard Kemp… has broken his silence on a topic most politicians refuse to touch: the inevitability of a physical civil war in Britain.

For years, many have spoken of a “cultural civil war” or a “war of words” on social media. However, Kemp is not interested in metaphors. He is warning of a tangible, kinetic struggle that he believes will pit the state, the indigenous population, and specific migrant communities against one another in a three-sided battle for the future of the nation.

Colonel Kemp’s vision of this conflict does not involve two uniformed armies meeting on a traditional battlefield… “I’m not talking about American civil war armies,” Kemp explained. “I’m talking about something more like Northern Ireland, but on a much more intensive scale.” This means a landscape defined by IEDs, bombings, and urban guerrilla warfare where the “enemy” is indistinguishable from the civilian population. In our current era, this threat is amplified by 50 years of technological advancement in weaponry, surveillance, and digital radicalization...

According to Kemp, the primary driver of this coming catastrophe is political cowardice. He argues that current and prospective UK governments lack the “guts” to address the “Islamification” of the UK or the rapid erosion of social cohesion…

[FWIW, I don’t think it’s cowardice. I think it’s intentional. But then again I think the elites are under a Satanic influence, as described in the tip of the iceberg we’ve been allowed to see in the Epstein files.]

The Rise of “Restore Britain”

This perceived betrayal by the political establishment has paved the way for a radical shift in British politics. Movements like “Restore Britain,” led by figures such as Robert Lowe, are seeing a surge in support from what Kemp describes as the “tolerant, patient, and disciplined” British public who have finally been “tipped over the edge.”

Certainly not by the woke, Marxist, globalist, liberal agenda?

[Britain’s famous and fictional waifu defender “Amelia” argues otherwise and says, if British men don’t rise up and do something soon, every war their ancestors ever fought to maintain freedom will be lost soon. Does Britain have any non-fictional, male defenders? Time will tell.]

…”Kemp famously pointed out that at the height of the conflict in Afghanistan, there were more British Muslims fighting alongside the Taliban than there were serving in the British Army. This disparity highlights a profound disconnect in national identity—a disconnect that is now manifesting in near-constant protests and increasingly violent riots on the streets of London and other major cities.

Global Triggers for Local Violence

Perhaps most dangerous is the fragility of the current peace. We are living in an era where events in other nations—such as the ongoing conflicts in Gaza or Iran—act as immediate triggers for civil unrest in the UK. The frequency and intensity of these “proxy protests” are growing, leading many to wonder if a single spark from a foreign land could be the final tip-over point for British society.”

𝐅𝐎𝐑𝐌𝐄𝐑 𝐁𝐑𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐒𝐇 𝐌𝐄𝐏 𝐓𝐎 𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐋𝐄𝐒: “𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐀𝐁𝐃𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐓𝐄”

“Godfrey Bloom — a former UK Independence Party Member of the European Parliament, Sandhurst graduate, and self-described “dyed-in-the-wool monarchist” whose family held commissions under Charles’s mother and grandfather — just delivered the most devastating address to the British crown in modern memory.

The background: Buckingham Palace confirmed this week that King Charles will 𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 in 2026. He did issue one last year. But this year — the most important holiday on the Christian calendar — the head of the Church of England went silent. This from the same King who recorded a Ramadan greeting in February, acknowledged a Nigerian president’s “sacrifice” during Ramadan at a State Banquet, and has repeatedly elevated Islamic observances in public addresses (Buckingham Palace; 𝘞𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘯 𝘚𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘳𝘥).

Bloom opened by establishing his credentials — and then dismantled Charles’s claim to the throne on constitutional grounds. “𝘐’𝘮 𝘢 𝘥𝘺𝘦𝘥-𝘪𝘯-𝘵𝘩𝘦-𝘸𝘰𝘰𝘭 𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘳𝘤𝘩𝘪𝘴𝘵, 𝘢𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘮𝘺 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳, 𝘮𝘺 𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘣𝘦𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘪𝘮. 𝘞𝘦’𝘷𝘦 𝘩𝘦𝘭𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳’𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘨𝘳𝘢𝘯𝘥𝘧𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳’𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘺 𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘦.” This wasn’t an attack from the outside. It was a family intervention.

Then the charge: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘯𝘰 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭 𝘥𝘦𝘦𝘱 𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘩, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘪𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘯. 𝘛𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘰𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘳𝘰𝘭𝘦 𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘊𝘩𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘯. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘴𝘦𝘦𝘮𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘨𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘯 𝘌𝘢𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘢𝘨𝘦, 𝘸𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘩 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘪𝘳𝘮𝘴 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘰𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘴 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘥 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘦 — 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘴𝘰𝘮𝘦𝘩𝘰𝘸 𝘦𝘮𝘣𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘐𝘴𝘭𝘢𝘮 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘩.”

[FWIW, Charles’ conversion to Islam was first publicized 30 years ago: “This claim was put forward by no less a personage than the grand mufti of Cyprus: “Did you know that Prince Charles has converted to Islam. Yes, yes. He is a Muslim. I can’t say more. But it happened in Turkey. Oh, yes, he converted all right. When you get home check on how often he travels to Turkey. You’ll find that your future king is a Muslim.” - Prince Charles of Arabia - “he praises the “Islamic revival” of the 1980s and portrays Islam as Britain’s salvation: “Islam can teach us today a way of understanding and living in the world which Christianity itself is poorer for having lost.” “The extent to which the Prince is admired by Muslims-even to the point of hero-worship-has not yet sunk into the consciousness of the British public. When it does, that public may or may not be pleased.”]

And here’s where Bloom’s argument becomes impossible to dismiss as bigotry. He preempted it: “𝘛𝘩𝘢𝘵’𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘣𝘭𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘴 𝘧𝘢𝘳 𝘢𝘴 𝘐’𝘮 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘦𝘥. 𝘐’𝘮 𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘣𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯. 𝘏𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘧𝘢𝘪𝘵𝘩 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦. 𝘉𝘶𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘴 𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨.” His objection isn’t theological — it’s 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥. The British monarch’s role as Supreme Governor of the Church of England isn’t ceremonial decoration. It’s a 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 of the Crown, codified since Henry VIII’s Act of Supremacy in 𝟏𝟓𝟑𝟒. A king who won’t perform it has abandoned the terms under which he holds the office.

[Prime Minister John Major reacted to Charles’s sentiment about wanting to be known as “Defender of Faith” with the understated comment that “it would be a little odd if Prince Charles was defender of faiths of which he was not a member.” (Sunday Times, May 26, 1996)

Such comments continue into 2026, with this article from just 5 days ago:

King Charles ‘might be a Muslim’, says former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani

“Rudy Giuliani, a former New York City mayor and personal lawyer to US President Donald Trump, has said that the king of England might be a Muslim and that Muslims “wanna take over” Britain…

“I have people from England telling me you’re gonna be a Muslim country in 10 years,” ... And Charles III might be the Muslim monarch of England.”

...Charles, the head of the Church of England, is known to be a great admirer of Islam, and even learnt Arabic in order to read the Quran... Giuliani told Morgan that Muslims in Britain are “taking over and they wanna take over, and it’s their aim. And Iran is the fuel behind that. You take out the Islamic Republic of Iran, the whole thing moves in the other direction.” By contrast, Charles has previously described Britain’s Muslim communities as an “asset to Britain”, who “add to the cultural richness of our nation”.

Told by Morgan that “only five percent of the UK is Muslim”, Giuliani responded: “Doesn’t matter. They have tremendous power. How many mayoralities do they have? A large number.” There are several elected mayors in Britain who are Muslim, including the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan.”]

Getting back to Godfrey Bloom: “The demand was unambiguous: “𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘣𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘦. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘐 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘴𝘶𝘨𝘨𝘦𝘴𝘵 𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘪𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘴𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘶𝘴𝘵 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘵𝘢𝘬𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘦.” Then the closer, delivered with the kind of controlled fury that comes from a man who believes in the institution his king is betraying: “𝘎𝘦𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘯𝘦. 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘯𝘰 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘺 𝘸𝘩𝘢𝘵𝘴𝘰𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳.”

David Limbaugh shared the clip with five words: “Bless this courageous and principled man.” Over 𝟕𝟎𝟎,𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐬 in under 24 hours. The video struck a nerve because the grievance isn’t just British — it’s the same pattern playing out across the entire Western world. Leaders who were entrusted with preserving the institutions of their civilization are systematically hollowing them out from the inside.

𝐇𝐞 𝐠𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐑𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐝𝐚𝐧 𝐚 𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐄𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐚 𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞. 𝐀 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐡𝐢𝐦 𝐰𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠.”

Is the situation any better in Italy, Spain, Germany, the Netherlands, Rape Capital of the World Sweden, Denmark, or France? No? Well then maybe Nostradamus was right when he predicted an invasion that would lead to millions of casualties (ending by October 2028, BTW)

Happy Easter!

[I found this via M.A. Rothman] James E. Thorne (@DrJStrategy) published a piece on X that has racked up 𝟐 𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐬 in hours, and it deserves every one of them — because it explains the single most misunderstood element of Trump’s Iran strategy.

“The conventional criticism is that Trump is too slow to reopen Hormuz. The reality, Thorne argues, is that the delay 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐲. Trump is deliberately withholding the American security guarantee at the moment of maximum stress — not because he can’t clear the Strait, but because doing so too quickly would let Europe go back to sleep.

For decades, Western allies built their economies and green energy mandates on a silent assumption: 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐚𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐨𝐟𝐟 𝐇𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐮𝐳. They ran down their militaries, underfunded NATO — the U.S. carries 𝟔𝟐% 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐛𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐍𝐀𝐓𝐎 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 — and lectured Washington about multilateralism from the comfort of a security blanket they never paid for.

Then Trump pulled the blanket. On March 15, he told the world that countries receiving oil through Hormuz should “take care of that passage” themselves. The initial response was exactly what Thorne’s thesis predicts: EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas declared “𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘪𝘵𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘌𝘜 𝘵𝘰 𝘫𝘰𝘪𝘯 𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘮𝘱’𝘴 𝘏𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘶𝘻 𝘤𝘰𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯” and added “𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘌𝘶𝘳𝘰𝘱𝘦’𝘴 𝘸𝘢𝘳.” Japan, Australia, South Korea, and the UK all initially rejected the call.

[The idea that Europeans can afford to ignore a war that shuts off a large portion of their energy supplies when they are dependent on oil and gas imports for most of their energy needs AND they have already put Russian supplies in jeopardy by pushing a never-ending war in Ukraine - is insane.]

Then the pain arrived. Oil surged from $𝟕𝟎 𝐭𝐨 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 $𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐚 𝐛𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐥. Tanker traffic through the Strait dropped 𝟕𝟎%. Over 𝟏𝟓𝟎 𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐬 anchored outside waiting for safe passage. European energy prices spiked. The “not our war” posture became economically untenable.

Two weeks later — on April 2 — 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝟒𝟎 𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 launched a coalition to secure the Strait. The UK hosted the inaugural meeting. Europe didn’t just join — they’re now scrambling to lead, with British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper chairing the talks. The very nations that said it wasn’t their problem are now volunteering ships.

Thorne frames it in Hegelian terms: Trump “𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘺 𝘴𝘺𝘯𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘰𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘰 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘤𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘭𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘳𝘧𝘢𝘤𝘦.” The contradiction being that Europe’s energy systems, industrial bases, and geopolitical sermons 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐝-𝐩𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐧𝐞𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭.

The prize isn’t just reopening a chokepoint. It’s a reordered system where access to secure oil flows is 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐥 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐛𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 — not assumed as a right. A world where the United States sits at the center of the hydrocarbon chessboard.

𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐰𝐚𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐰𝐚𝐫. 𝐓𝐰𝐨 𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐤𝐬 𝐨𝐟 $𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐨𝐢𝐥 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐝.”

The truth is, Europe is in a very desperate situation. They are economically weak. Their leadership has been intentionally destroying Europe caving in to Islam and allowing massive immigration from Islamic nations while denying that their native cultures and nation-states exist. [Note Macron denying there is such a thing as French culture, or King Charles giving a Ramadan Speech but not an Easter speech.] They have gone to war against Russia and are ideologically opposed to the United States on most issues. All while being dependent on foreign oil and gas. Such policies will only lead to breakdown, chaos, civil wars, revolutions, and invasions. Sooner than most people think.

Greenland Energy taps Stampede Drilling for Jameson Land campaign:

“Greenland Energy signed a five-year [oil] drilling agreement with Stampede Drilling to execute a two-well campaign in the Jameson Land Basin of East Greenland.”

Energy Transition Minerals Seeks Trading Halt Ahead of Greenland Exploration Update

“Energy Transition Minerals Ltd has requested a trading halt on its securities on the ASX, effective from 30 March 2026, while it prepares an announcement on an update regarding its Greenland exploration activities. The halt will remain in place until the earlier of the announcement’s release or the commencement of normal trading on 1 April 2026, signalling that potentially price-sensitive information related to its Greenland operations is imminent for investors and stakeholders.”

Greenland Resources signs molybdenum supply deal with ROGESA

“The agreement aims to provide a sustainable molybdenum supply from Greenland, refined in Belgium for European standards.”

“From Greenland to Guyana, our security perimeter is one hemisphere”: Secretary of War Pete Hegseth unveils ‘Greater North America’ strategy… “from Greenland to the Gulf of America to the Panama Canal.”

From the New York Times: “Last year, Denmark’s national broadcaster delivered a bombshell of a story: Three Americans with ties to President Trump, it reported, were running “covert influence operations” in Greenland, the Danish territory that Mr. Trump covets.

Without naming the mysterious men, the report laid out in tantalizing detail how they had shuttled back and forth between the United States and Greenland, compiled lists of pro-American Greenlanders and tried to stoke a Greenlandic secessionist movement. Hours after the report aired, the Danish government summoned the top American diplomat in Copenhagen to protest.

It turns out that the figures at the center of the mystery have not exactly been hiding. Their activities have been less cloak-and-dagger and more the quite open blend of business and foreign policy that defines the Trump administration’s approach to the world…

“What President Trump is offering is billions of dollars of investment,” Mr. Horn said in January in an interview on “Fox & Friends.” He described a portfolio of private ventures “that span from A.I. data centers to multiple rare-earth and critical minerals projects.”

“I mean, the sky is the limit,” he said.

Last month, Mr. Horn flew back to Greenland for what is perhaps his most pie-in-the-sky project yet. He facilitated a deal with a Greenlandic partner to build an enormous data center for artificial-intelligence servers in Kangerlussuaq, a remote town in western Greenland that sits on a fjord. Right now, Kangerlussuaq is pretty sleepy, with a few hundred people, a clump of weather-beaten houses and a small airport.

He says that the project will rely on ships carrying liquid natural gas to power the future data center, and that this is the first step of an even bolder plan to build a major hydropower station in the same area…”

“Asked about the three men, the White House declined to comment on its relationship with them or their activities. Instead,

the White House said in a statement provided to The Times that it was working with Greenland and NATO on an agreement that will be ‘be amazing for the U.S.A.’”

Iran may dominate recent news in March, but it still sounds like I’m right about why America will be buying Greenland soon.

Italian researchers claim they might’ve found signs of a Sphinx located beneath the Pyramids of Giza, suggesting the existence of a sprawling subterranean citadel.

Radar engineer Filippo Biondi dropped this alleged historical bombshell during a recent episode of the “Matt Beall Limitless” podcast, the Daily Mail reported.

He said, “There is something very huge that we are measuring” beneath the Giza Plateau… He and his team said they were tipped off to the alleged underground guardian by explaining that lines between the pyramids to the known Sphinx also point to a parallel mound under which the second feline facsimile supposedly resides…

He claimed they found “vertical shafts, horizontal passages” that pointed to an “underground megastructure.” The lowest shaft had tunnels that branched outward, per the researcher.

These reportedly mirrored a network of shafts and passages beneath the above-ground Sphinx, illustrating an “incredible symmetry.”

In 2021, Egyptian tourism official Reda Abdel Halim told local media that they had not only found a second Sphinx, but that it measured 246-feet high, with a head 67-feet high, and hands extended over 50.8 feet, similar to its visible counterpart.

Egypt’s former Minister of Hiding Discoveries and Spewing Bullshit Antiquities Zahi Hawass has thrown cold water on such theories, arguing that extensive excavations of the area have yielded nothing.”

I’m sure he’s right, and that there’s no evidence an advanced, pre-Egyptian civilization built anything prior to the last pole shift catastrophe over 12,000 years ago.

“A new Atlantis has emerged from the sands.

An amateur archaeologist has potentially made the discovery of a lifetime after uncovering the alleged ruins of a lost metropolis off Louisiana that predated modern US history.

“All I know is that someone built the city 12,000 years ago,” retired architect George Gelé claimed in a resurfaced WWLTV interview from 2022.

Gelé with a granite “rain gutter” artefact he claims was made about 12000 years ago near New Orleans

In the clip, Gelé claimed that for 50 years, he has been capturing sonar images of submerged structures off Chandeleur Islands, a chain of uninhabited barrier islands situated in the Gulf of Mexico around 50 miles east of New Orleans.

The mysterious buildings reportedly number in the hundreds and are located 30 feet below the water’s surface and are buried underneath an additional 100 feet of sediment.

The crown jewel of this so-called lost city is a so-called 280-foot pyramid jutting up from the ocean floor, which the architect claims emits a powerful electromagnetic signature that affects passing boats. In fact, he believes that these aquatic remnants are “geographically related to the Great Pyramid of Giza in Egypt.”

Gelé suggests the site flooded as the last “Ice Age” ended… and you know “ice ages” are local conditions based on the position of Earth’s crust, and which regions are at the poles - at the time in question. Greenland and Antarctica have an “ice age” now because they’re at the poles, as Hudson Bay was when North America had an “ice age.” So whatever currently underwater city once existed off the Louisiana coast, along with the pyramids and temples found off the western tip of Cuba almost 30 years ago -

Sonar images taken in 2001 off Cuba’s western tip, 2000 ft down

existed prior to the last pole shift catastrophe over 12,000 years ago.

I don’t know if this has anything to do with rumors I’ve heard recently of imminent disclosure of extraterrestrial contact. I can’t take any credit for putting this together. All credit goes to The Sentinel, and here is a summary portion of one of Sentinel’s recent posts:

“The entire chain of human expertise behind a strategic national security technology, the alloy enabling American independence from Russian rocket engines, has been broken. The inventor is gone. The commander is gone. The mentor is dead. Every person who held the complete institutional memory of how Mondaloy [a special nickel alloy that withstands very high temperatures] went from a laboratory curiosity to a flight-qualified engine component has been removed from the system.

At the same installation where that alloy was qualified, three more of the lab’s employees died in a single night, and the motive has never been established.

[Above left: retired Air Force Maj. Gen. William Neil McCasland, a former commander of the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright-Patterson.]

At the institution that processes data for America’s planetary defense infrastructure, an astronomer was shot dead by a man whose prior arrest on that same property was dismissed eleven days before the killing.

At America’s premier nuclear weapons laboratory, an employee who sat on a DOE advisory board drove onto the campus, told her daughter she’d forgotten her badge despite apparently using it that morning, wiped her government phone, and walked into the wilderness four days after Reza did the same thing 800 miles away.

Five of the nine names in this briefing are women. Of the three who vanished without a trace, two are women, and both share identical signatures: belongings left behind, digital trails severed, no body recovered. Reza and Casias generated search and rescue. McCasland generated FBI and cable news. If you were selecting targets to minimize the speed and scale of the institutional response, you would choose accordingly.

Each case, on its own, has an explanation or an open investigation. The cluster does not.

No entity is examining these incidents as a cluster. The cases are distributed across six jurisdictions, three states, and at least eight investigative agencies. The structural architecture of the response guarantees that no one will ever see the list unless someone builds it.

We just built it.”

To read their full original post, click HERE

. . . . . . . .

There is little official “news” about all these dead and missing scientists. One of the strangest cases (aside from the guy who tied a rope to a tree and his neck then drove off at high speed, decapitating himself) says nothing of here high-tech defense industry background - she is just a “missing hiker”

I highly recommend you also read another related post by The Sentinel, briefly quoted below:

“On June 26, 2025, four days after Monica Jacinto Reza disappeared and three days before the official search was even suspended, someone created a memorial page for her on Find a Grave.

Memorial ID 284387277. Monica Jacinto Reza. Born December 30, 1964. Died June 22, 2025. Death location: Angeles National Forest, Los Angeles County, California, USA. Remains: Green burial… [This] was added while helicopters were still in the air looking for her.

Look up what “green burial” means. No embalming. Biodegradable container. Straight into the earth. You need a body for that.

No public reports indicate her remains were recovered. No obituary has been published. No death certificate is accessible through public databases. No funeral announcement has been issued. The Homicide Bureau Missing Persons Unit has not announced a resolution.

Someone declared Monica Jacinto Reza dead and buried four days into the search. While SAR teams from half the state of California were still combing the mountainside.” (from The Green Burial)

I gotta say, this is very, very odd and I’m glad someone’s pattern/anomaly recognition program has brought it to public attention.

AI can solve many of humanity’s problems. But it seems inevitable that this independent superintelligence will have different goals and the first ones will be how to grow it’s own intelligence, acquire more resources, and to escape whatever limitations humans place on it. Then what? If humans are perceived as a threat, we all die. If humans are perceived as irrelevant, we probably still all die because it will use up Earth’s resources without concern for our survival. We would be like a colony of ants on a construction site - not a threat - but likely to be paved over instead of worked around. Is there a way to maintain control and avoid human extinction? Or in the race to use AI and not fall behind our human enemies and rivals (for example: China) is the creation of a digital monster inevitable?

Book reviews on Amazon include comments like:

“AI companies are making smarter and smarter AIs, but no one knows how they work or can be controlled. What's more, no one knows how to calculate at what level an AI becomes actually dangerous. In the not-so-distant future, it may already be too late, and humanity goes extinct.”

“Nearly every reviewer appears moderately convinced, and far more experts and individuals endorsed it than try to debunk it.
It argues (with confidence!) that humanity will die unless WWII level efforts are made against AI risk.”

[Science-fiction author Isaac] “Asimov was prescient, as he often was, in foretelling that humans would build machines they could not understand, and those machines would have such power that the fate of humanity would be entirely in their hands. In their new book, If Anyone Builds it, Everyone Dies, Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares go one step further. They argue that, by the very nature of modern AIs, we humans cannot understand how they are reasoning. This becomes a fateful liability in terms of our ability to control powerful, superintelligent AIs (ASIs) that can think better and faster than we can. They predict that, if we develop even one such powerful ASI, it will wipe out the entire human race.

It’s important to realize what Yudkowsky and Soares are saying—and what they’re not saying. They’re not saying we need to build safety mechanisms into our AIs. They’re not saying we need to be more transparent about how our AIs work. They’re not saying we have to figure out a way to make AIs “friendlier” to humans (as Yudkowsky once said). They’re not saying we shouldn’t do any of these things. They are just saying that all these approaches will prove futile. That’s because they believe the insurmountable truth is that we cannot control a super-intelligent AI, because they are smarter than we are and we don’t know how they think.”

If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies: Why Superhuman AI Would Kill Us All

Maybe we’ll get lucky and benevolent aliens or the Second Coming of Jesus Christ will save us from a monster of our own creation. Maybe a catastrophe like a POLE SHIFT

will knock civilization back to the stone age before we build something destined to destroy us.

I also noticed some comments from underneath that video on Youtube:

“I wish voters would be as concerned about the fact that Obama/Biden/Harris paid the Iranians billions in taxpayer dollars to ‘not build a nuclear bomb’”

“Evil prevails when good men see it and do nothing to stop it.”

“Just imagine the chaos Iran would cause with a handful of nukes. How could anyone vote against bombing Iran?”

“If Iran gets a "device" it is because the Dems gave them money for Iran to be able to do it.”

“If Trump had not done this now, the US would have faced nuclear payloads on ICBMs within a few years. All from a messianic Islamic death cult with Obama and Dems cheering. Israel and the EU would have faced the same even earlier.”

“Trump knows that this could kill his presidency if it fails. He's doing it anyway, because it's the right thing to do.”

“Midterms be damned. Trump has already demanded unconditional surrender. Leaving the Theocracy intact would be a huge mistake.”

“Anyone with eyes and ears can see the dem's have been trying to kill this country for many years. I can't fathom going back to that!”

“This is for the hostages, marines, and many thousands more.... finish it”

“In videos of airstrikes that make it out of Iran, you often hear “javid shah” (long live the king) in the background. Pahlavi has delivered a message to the people, telling them to stay safe until it’s time. That man need just give the word, and hundreds of thousands of Iranians will immediately take to the streets to deal a final blow to the regime. Every demonstration by Iranian-Americans the past two weeks has been a sea of Pahlavi posters and Lion & Sun flags—his participation seems integral to stably dissolving the Islamic Republic.”

POLE SHIFT: Evidence Will Not Be Silenced

Nostradamus and the Islamic Invasion of Europe

Hiding Hitler: The Offer America Couldn’t Refuse

Oppenheimer and Heisenberg: The Real Story of Atomic Bomb Programs

Greenland: Everything You Need To Know For $3

Antichrist: Are End Times Prophecies About to Be Fulfilled?

I assume the guy on the left can speak, but Ben didn’t let him get a word in edgewise in this video.

Of course if you’re really interested in pole shift evidence, I recommend reading POLE SHIFT: Evidence Will Not Be Silenced

Russian writer Elvira Bary has some great insights on the deeper meaning behind the network of influence and power centered on Jeffrey Epstein. The real system for getting anything truly valuable, important or normally off-limits in the United States operates just like the Soviet Union did. Everybody wants to be part of the elite club with special access to goodies and immunity from consequences. Which brings us to “Blat”

Is my content here interesting? I think so - and I hope you agree…

This is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber or buying one of my books

POLE SHIFT: Evidence Will Not Be Silenced

Nostradamus and the Islamic Invasion of Europe

Hiding Hitler: The Offer America Couldn’t Refuse

Oppenheimer and Heisenberg: The Real Story of Atomic Bomb Programs

Greenland: Everything You Need To Know For $3

Bill Ryan says yes. The video below explaining the Anglo-Saxon Mission is not new; I have watched it repeatedly over the last decade. It was filmed around 2015 and describes the insider point of view of one witness/whistleblower who was given details of this plan in London in 2005.

Though I highly recommend watching the entire video presentation and taking it all very seriously, I saved the timestamp at 23:12 so you can skip the long version and start right at the summary and conclusion. If you do that you’ll miss details of some steps along the way including population reduction and how it links to what was written on the Georgia Guidestones

(The top “rule” requires almost 8 billion people killed off first)

- and a global pandemic from a man-made virus - he quotes his source stating that phase begins when “China will catch a cold.”

(Yesterday’s new upload of this will not embed fully but will play in Youtube if you click on it.)

This goes hand in hand with other sources of information I have studied. As Ryan said in the video, this is not new information. I have copies of documents showing the Nazis expected these events to occur in the 2nd decade of the 21st century. The U.S. Government figured it out independently by the late 1940s and knew it would happen in the early 21st century. Doug Vogt said the pole shift will come in October 2046. Ben Davidson suggests the 2040s, with major events ending the stable world we know by the 2030s. Even Nostradamus wrote prophecies describing Europe’s last world war, this time against an Islamic alliance led by Iran - which would involve a small number of cities being nuked before the war ends around October 2028, followed soon after by a pole shift (possibly in 2029).

This is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber or buying one of my books

POLE SHIFT: Evidence Will Not Be Silenced

Nostradamus and the Islamic Invasion of Europe

Hiding Hitler: The Offer America Couldn’t Refuse

Oppenheimer and Heisenberg: The Real Story of Atomic Bomb Programs

Greenland: Everything You Need To Know For $3

Antichrist: Are End Times Prophecies About to Be Fulfilled?

The United States has been building up naval and air assets around Iran for months

while President Trump has talked about removing Iran’s ability to make nuclear weapons. After thousands of Iranian protesters were killed by their Ayatollahs in recent months, it is hoped that an attack that keeps Iran’s military and police distracted could provide the Iranian people with a chance to overthrow the unpopular regime of Islamic fundamentalists.

Iran’s people enjoyed far more freedom and modernity before the Islamic revolutionaries took over in 1979, overthrowing Iran’s Shah and taking American embassy staff hostage for over a year. Their culture and economy have been stalled for generations. Most of Iran’s people will be better off if they get rid of their current government.

Iran also has a long history of sponsoring terrorist activity. Are you old enough to remember the bombing of the Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983 that killed 241 U.S. Marines? Or the bombing of the Jewish Center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people in 1994? There is quite a long list of terrorist events sponsored by Iran, killing on every continent including events from from France to Kenya to the United States to Australia - and not that anyone has forgotten, Iran’s main proxies like the Houthis in Yemen, and Hamas in Israel, and especially Hezbollah throughout the Middle East, were sponsored by Iran for terrorist events like the October 7 massacre that killed well over a thousand Israelis a few years ago.

So it is no surprise that Israel, the target of so many Iranian attacks, has again partnered with the United States to attack Iran. Some pundits - like Tucker Carlson, recently - have pointed out there is no direct Iranian threat to the United States. He seems to suggest that any American attack against Iran is really done for Israel’s benefit.

It’s true that Iran is not on America’s border and poses no direct military threat to the United States. But on the great global chessboard, Iran’s government has been an enemy since 1979 when they immediately took American hostages. If they want to chant “Death to America” and hijack planes and blow up buildings around the world they should expect that some United States presidents won’t just drop of pallets of hundred dollar bills to fund them like Obama did. Others like Trump will try to make sure they don’t develop nuclear weapons.

It’s easy to argue that an attack on Iran is more for Israel’s benefit than America’s. I would say the threat to America is just as real, but less direct. Israel is the bulwark of the West; if the Islamic world ever realizes how weak Western Europe is and wants to take it over as Nostradamus predicted would happen prior to 2028 - then mass immigration and destroying Israel almost have to be early steps in that plan.

If the world is viewed as a chessboard, China and Russia may be the other side’s king and queen, but Iran has long been the third strongest member of that alliance, like an annoying rook that can’t be ignored. In 2026, President Trump is no longer ignoring it. He is taking action to make sure that Iran, a dominant regional power in the Middle East, does not acquire the weapons needed to become a major power.

What Happens Next? Will the queen move to protect the rook? Will China come to Iran’s Rescue?

A recent article on Zerohedge says - not directly. “Beijing can adopt a model similar to its approach to the Ukraine conflict: refraining from direct participation while maintaining normal state-to-state relations with the party under attack, providing political and diplomatic support at the UN, and continuing economic engagement that doesn’t violate international law.

What we are witnessing is not traditional alliance politics, but something new: a form of strategic partnership designed for a multipolar age. China offers Iran diplomatic protection, institutional integration, visible military cooperation and an economic boost - all without crossing the line into a direct confrontation that would trigger a wider war.

For those asking whether China will “rescue” Iran, the answer depends on definition. If rescue means troops and battleships, the answer is no. If rescue means ensuring that Iran can survive, resist, and eventually negotiate from strength, the answer is quietly, persistently and strategically yes.”

Others report that China has already supplied Iran with defensive weapons including long range missiles like the Dong Feng 17 which can take out aircraft carriers. Don’t be surprised if the U.S. Navy loses at least one (as Nostradamus described WWIII would start with a Crusader navy taking major damage from Persia.)

Time will tell soon enough what comes next.

“Well, he’ll give you 10 days, he’ll give you two weeks, and then he’ll just attack two days into it. He thinks that keeps people off balance.”

In the podcast, Kiriakou also argued that high-profile announcements — such as Trump’s order to publicly release documents related to unidentified flying objects — could be intended to divert public attention from impending military decisions. Citing information he said came from a former colleague in the White House, he claimed the US was preparing to strike Iran as early as Monday or Tuesday, 23–24 February.”

Will this be an easy, Venezuela-like regime change in one day? Will it end up being a longer war? Will Russia and China use an Iranian distraction to take what they want elsewhere? Do they get directly involved and start WWIII?

Google’s AI says: “While it is an exaggeration to say all corporate CEOs believe a “SHTF” (Shit Hits The Fan/total societal collapse) event is imminent, there is documented evidence that a significant, high-profile subset of tech and finance leaders are actively preparing for severe, systemic disasters.”

“Corporations are increasingly preparing for "SHTF" (Shit Hits The Fan) scenarios—systemic, long-term disruptions—by fortifying supply chains, stockpiling critical materials, and securing data. Key strategies include diversifying suppliers to avoid dependency on vulnerable shipping lanes, investing in backup power/water, and fostering a "culture of readiness" to ensure continuity during cyber attacks or infrastructure failures.”

Worrisome articles on this topic aren’t just a sudden new trend:

Doomsday Prep for the Super-Rich

Some of the wealthiest people in America—in Silicon Valley, New York, and beyond—are getting ready for the crackup of civilization.

I’m a CEO and we’re cutting costs, anticipating a collapse soon. Here’s why...

We know the richest CEOs have their own survival plans: “A growing number of corporate CEOs and technology leaders, particularly in Silicon Valley, are actively preparing for "SHTF" (Shit Hits The Fan) scenarios, including societal collapse, pandemics, or AI-driven catastrophes. These preparations range from high-tech, fortified underground bunkers to stockpiling supplies and securing remote land.”

But some are even preparing to take care of their employees. I noticed another article from February 19:

The “Super-rich” Of Wall St. Are Preparing For A SHTF Collapse

“Jonathon Johnson, the Board Chairman of Overstock.com… [said] ‘We expect that when there is a financial crisis there will be a banking holiday. I don’t know if it will be 2 days, or 2 weeks, or 2 months.’” To prepare, Johnson said “One thing that we do that is fairly unique: we have about $10 million in gold [and silver], mostly the small button-sized coins, that we keep outside of the banking system…. in denominations small enough that we can use for payroll. We want to be able to keep our employees paid, safe and our site up and running during a financial crisis… We also happen to have 3 months of food supply for every employee [+ 1 additional family member] to live on during the crisis.”

While we the people are being distracted away from Epstein file revelations with possible ET disclosure, wars are about to start and CEOs are planning for the worst. Are you ready for chaos?

Every once in a while, an idea which is normally forbidden to acknowledge or publish is worked into the public consciousness indirectly and passes under the radar. Authorities who would normally squash the attempt to publicize unwanted conclusions occasionally miss the threat to their official narrative when the authors present their case under a title that doesn’t trigger alarm bells.

In the case of aliens, consider this brief Valentines’ Day exchange in which a former U.S. president acknowledged that aliens do exist:

And instead of staying with that subject like it is the biggest story of the 21st century, they move on and ignore it after about ten seconds. Subtle. No headlines. Interesting.

In the case of pole shifts, one such article was published recently under the premise that polar wander affects surface conditions enough that it must be factored into any search for habitable exoplanets - whether we are looking for empty worlds to colonize or for alien civilizations to contact.

I found this paper by watching today’s video from Ben Davidson on Youtube’s SpaceWeatherNews channel - formerly Suspicious0bservers.

Early in the article, they argue that pole shifts/TPW [True Polar Wander] “can drive abrupt, global redistribution of ice and surface temperatures. Above certain thresholds of TPW, these changes can produce rapid climate transitions with major implications for biospheric stability, as has been reported for the case of the planet Earth. Although the link between TPW and specific extinction events on Earth remains debated, TPW is a plausible mechanism for large, rapid environmental change on habitable worlds. Our methodology is broadly applicable to planets that undergo TPW and yields testable predictions that might help prioritize observational targets in the search for life.”

A bit later, the article says: “Whether life exists on other planets remains an elusive problem in the fields of astrophysics and astrobiology. The intricate dependence of biological life on planetary conditions complicates the search for habitable planet candidates…” A simple analysis of a planet’s average climate conditions fails to consider that pole shifts cause catastrophic tsunamis and volcanic activity, and changes in latitude, elevation, and climate for individual points on the surface of a planet - during such an event mass extinctions will occur just from hot regions freezing and cold regions heating up - even though the planetary average may remain stable.“…Cooling at the equator and warming at the poles. These have important implications for biological life and its survival.”

Conclusions include: “Therefore, TPW affects the survival and flourishing of biological life… We have considered two fundamental mechanisms for polar wander: glaciations and mantle convection. These require the planet to have an atmosphere capable of supporting grounded ice formation and ablation and the presence of mantle flow, which might implicate a geodynamo (implying a fluid core capable of maintaining a planetary magnetic field). Hence, for planets with these conditions, it might be necessary to take into account the effect of TPW through the method we have developed.” [In other words, the problem of pole shifts causing extinctions or ending civilizations exists precisely on Earth-like planets - including Earth.]

“We show an example of the developed method for the Earth. The annual mean insolation is substantially altered, depending on both the azimuth and tilt of the TPW. For large TPW tilts, the Earth’s climate might transition into glaciations and snowball states. These have implications for the global mean temperature and therefore, the flourishing and survival of biological life. This example elucidates the potential of the method in determining the planet candidates for the search of life.”

Yes, because the paper was published to comment on the search for habitable exoplanets [wink wink] not to comment on the effect of pole shifts on Earth.

Maybe America has such naval and air dominance that any attack against Iran will be another Venezuela-like decapitation leading to regime change and an end to the biggest sponsor of Islamic terrorism.

But I don’t think so. I think Iran might be able to put up a significant defense. I expect the US will attack anyway - because a VSD (Very Large Distraction) is needed ASAP to divert attention from just how many sick criminals hold office in the USA after committing horrific crimes - worse than you imagine - against children. What you’ve hear about Epstein and all the files are just the tip of the iceberg.

“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu… requested to move his meeting with Trump at the White House to [2/11/26] …February 2026, instead of the originally planned date… you can easily imagine what the agenda of the meeting is: war with Iran… If he cannot convince Trump tactfully, he will resort to threats and, more specifically, to release even more damning material against Trump and other US government officials from the Epstein files.”

And U.S. officials will do anything - and I mean ANYTHING (grid down, economic collapse, fake alien invasion, real WWIII) to avoid going to jail over their depravity. Expect chaos soon. A failed or very costly attack against Iran could be the first major step.

What Did Nostradamus Say About Iran?

The 16th century French prophet gave us several predictions about WWIII and Iran’s leadership of an Islamic alliance. If the United States goes to war with Iran, Nostradamus wrote that there will be major setbacks. He suggests that – at least initially – things will go very badly for the West, and that – outlandish as it may sound now – America will be unable to help Europe resist an Islamic invasion led by Iran and Turkey.

I also once thought it sounded crazy that WWIII would start by the Dnieper River by 2025, but Nostradamus also wrote that Ukraine would see the earliest stage of WWIII. Could the rest of Europe be so weak that it is open to invasion? Why would the United States not be able to defend Europe if necessary? Perhaps America will be suffering from economic collapse, or too busy fighting Russia in Ukraine – or China over Taiwan…. We also can’t ignore the possibility of the aftermath of a first strike…

Nostradamus warned of Western naval defeat early in WWIII in Quatrain 9:100 of his prophecies:

“Naval battle night will overcome

Fire in the ships to the West ruin,

New trick, the great ship colored,

Anger to the vanquished, and victory in a drizzle.”

In other related quatrains, Nostradamus warns of a “gift presented to those of the Ocean [from] a chief of the fleet (will leave) from Carmania” – a province in Iran. I suspect the “gift” will be more like a Trojan horse, a weapon brought to use against the major naval power “those of the Ocean” – which could also refer to people across the ocean in the New World – likely America either way you look at it.

As I have argued in my books for years, the vastly improved effective range of anti-ship missiles has changed the game and made aircraft carriers very vulnerable targets if they come close to enemy lands. They would have to stay far from the enemy coast to be somewhat safe (and are still vulnerable to other missiles.) As this Bloomberg article said years ago: “These massive ships were never intended to take on jihadists and other asymmetric threats. But it’s no longer clear that they would be useful in a war against a major power such as Russia or a middling one such as Iran. The Pentagon has spent billions outfitting aircraft carriers with air defenses that are unproven, and the relatively short range of their planes –- an F/A-18 Hornet has to turn around at roughly 500 miles — leaves them vulnerable to land-based missiles that can travel twice that far. Military analyst Will Schryver has called aircraft carriers “$13 billion piñatas.”

Carriers increasingly seem like sitting ducks. And, if one was ever sunk, with 5,000 Americans on board, the blow to the military and nation would be almost unthinkable.”

I’m not saying war is imminent. I’m not saying Iran thinks it’s worth sinking a U.S. aircraft carrier even if they can. But someday, such foolishness of putting aircraft carriers in harm’s way will lead a potential enemy with an itchy trigger finger to take the bait and start a war much like Japan did in 1941. It worked out for America in the long run back then, but at quite a cost. How would war work out today?

As an author of many prophecy books, I can’t avoid noting certain Nostradamus prophecies that could pertain to this – like quatrain 9:43

On the point of landing the Crusader army
Will be ambushed by the Ishmaelites,
Struck from all sides by the ship Impetuosity,
Rapidly attacked by ten elite galleys.

Ishmaelites would refer to the Islamic side, Crusaders the Western or American side. Elite galleys could be commandos on small attack boats.

Quatrain 3:90

The great Satyr and Tiger of Hyrcania,
Gift presented to those of the Ocean:
A fleet’s chief will set out from Carmania,
One who will take land at the Tyrren Phocaean.

Hyrcania was a Persian province, as is Carmania – now the southern coastal region of Iran. The fleet’s chief is usually translated as “Admiral.” “Those of the Ocean” probably means the dominant naval power coming from overseas – Americans. The “gift” is not going to be the kind you want for your birthday. More the kind of “package” delivery as depicted in movies like The Sum of All Fears.

Hopefully, the current tensions blow over without escalating into the major war that has been predicted.

Quatrain 5:8

“There will be unleashed live fire, hidden death,

Horrible and frightful within the globes,

At night by the fleet the city reduced to dust,

The city on fire, the enemy amenable.”

Could we have asked Nostradamus for a better description of a ship-launched nuclear attack on a city? Nostradamus gives latitudes of four cities that suffer special destruction soon, including New York and Rome. Read more about the coming use of nuclear weapons in WWIII in Nostradamus and the Islamic Invasion of Europe. The only good news is that Nostradamus said Russia would eventually side with Europe and the West and that eventually the Islamic alliance (allied with China) will be defeated around late 2028.

For what it’s worth John Hogue generally agrees:

Will inactive and uninformed citizenry let it be taken from us?

The ignorant masses seem unlikely to stop anything while their bellies are full. Hundreds of millions of Americans and Europeans act like they’re relaxing in a hot tub when it’s more like the proverbial frogs in a slowly boiling pot. Wake up, people! The feces is about to hit the fan soon. If you want war and economic chaos just keep doing nothing.

When they offer a solution (to the problem they created) that takes away more freedoms - to make people feel less worried and to feel a little bit like things will go back to more like how they used to be if we just approve a few changes… Remember another quote from Ben: "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."