Ask Yourself: Were the George Floyd Murder and the Riots Spontaneous, or Paid For By...
The blatantly unnecessary death/murder of George Floyd at the knee of a Minneapolis police officer was caught on film and seems so obviously wrong that perhaps we should ask - who benefits enough to - just possibly - have paid for such a horrific show? How many cameras filmed it? How many officers allowed it? Are cops really that racist and stupid? Or should we be asking: How much money would it take to achieve such evil results on camera?
Hypothetically, maybe ten million dollars could entice someone to take such horrific action against someone while being filmed.... Especially if more anonymous millions were promised to provide good lawyers and "influence" legal decisions on the case. Especially if the hypothetical volunteer[s] had other legal and financial problems that would be solved in return for their cooperation.
Could a big organization already have planned such an event and also to fan the resulting flames and organize dozens of riots in response to further destabilize America?
[About 14 hours after writing this post, I saw this on Zerohedge: "Mysterious pallets of bricks have been filmed throughout major riot hotspots across the country, in what appears to be more evidence that organized groups are using the George Floyd protests to incite chaos and terrorism throughout the US." Hmmmm. Seems to back up my suspicions a little....]
In no particular order, multiple possibilities come to mind right away:
1 - China benefits by drawing attention away from itself. I'm not seeing any news footage of Hong Kong crackdowns or protests today. America looks really bad right now. "US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi once called the violent protests in Hong Kong 'a beautiful sight to behold.'... US politicians now can enjoy this sight from their own windows," Hu Xijin, editor-in-chief of nationalist tabloid Global Times, wrote on Saturday.
2 - The Democratic Party - and anyone rich and powerful enough, like George Soros, who might want to destabilize Trump's America and help make it possible for a candidate with senile dementia who can't possibly hold a competent debate to defeat Trump in November - might have the ability to influence events.
If you really want Biden [or whoever his Vice Presidential choice eventually is] as president, lighting fifty American cities on fire under Trump's presidency really, really helps your previously low odds. Read this guy: he's not sarcastic - he's serious when he says: "Thank you, rioters: you’ve provided new role models in the global crisis."
3 - "The Elite" - somebody already orchestrated a plandemic that may or may not have killed 100,000 people in America alone and the response to this - what is equivalent to a very bad flu season, not the Bubonic Plague - is to eliminate tens of millions of jobs at a cost of perhaps ten TRILLION dollars, ($10,000,000,000,000) most of which doesn't trickle down to the people, but has already gone to banking and corporate bailouts.... Might they be willing to go further in their quest for a more controlled police state? Because if current events continue, the people will soon be begging for martial law to "restore order." Read this article by Clive Maund for deeper insights.
Because I question how THIS level of destructive rioting would spontaneously arise over one murder, especially when it seems like the police officer in question is very likely to go to jail - and what are his odds of survival there? Lower than Jeffrey Epstein's, I think. So I'm wondering, Cui bono? (Who benefits?) Because there's a lot of money to be made in skewing the news and influencing the people.
4 - Even this far out idea by a fan of my Pole Shift book seems more reasonable to me than spontaneous public actions - that those in power know a civilization ending pole shift is coming so soon that they need to both distract the world from the obvious signs and achieve a vastly increased level of control over society's labor and resources to make the final preparations.... "that current events are a prelude to natural destruction, not Machiavellian malevolence...." "more folk are beginning to entertain ‘end times’ as an underlying cause – as opposed to the popular ideas of manouvres toward global totalitarianism, or yet another phase of plutocratic enrichment."
I tried to find an appropriate scene to emphasize such points from the movie "2012" - in which they predicted a civilization ending pole shift at the end of the Mayan Long Count calendar on December 21, 2012. I too once speculated that their 2012 date might indicate either the disaster itself, or the beginning of the final seven years ending in December 2019... only to eventually realize their marker in time was merely a vague way of saying, we're getting very close - it can happen soon after this alignment.
For what it's worth, Nostradamus suggests WWIII ending in late 2028 with the pole shift in October 2029. [And Isaac Newton suggested not the year 2060, as has often been attributed to him - but some date in the 21st century that he never calculated exactly.] And on that note, I can end with some entertaining but appropriate clips from "2012"
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYenE8NG-_o&w=500&h=375]
Oh, what the heck, this is how most of the world views these topics anyway....
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqH208qwEZI&w=500&h=375]
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZKd-_HCeSQ&w=500&h=375]
