From the recent article at Vice.com
Congress Admits UFOs Not ‘Man-Made,’ Says ‘Threats’ Increasing ‘Exponentially’
"Congress seems to have admitted something startling in print: it doesn’t believe all UFOs are “man-made.” Buried deep in a report that’s an addendum to the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, a budget that governs America’s clandestine services, Congress made two startling claims. The first is that “cross-domain transmedium threats to the United States national security are expanding exponentially.” The second is that it wants to distinguish between UFOs that are human in origin and those that are not: “Temporary nonattributed objects, or those that are positively identified as man-made after analysis, will be passed to appropriate offices and should not be considered under the definition as unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena,” the document states.
The admission is stunning chiefly because, as more information about the U.S. government’s study of UFOs has become public, many politicians have stopped just short of claiming the unidentified objects were extraterrestrial or extradimensional in origin.... But now Congress seems to want to specifically distinguish between objects that are “man-made” and those that are not.
[We have probably had the technology to build craft that would qualify as UFOs since the 1940s.
I know three people who saw a classic TR3B "black triangle" this summer.]
A “cross-domain transmedium” threat is one that, by the Pentagon’s definition, can move from water to air to space in ways we don’t understand.... Last year, a leaked video that was confirmed by the Pentagon as being authentic appeared to show a UFO seamlessly flying beneath the waves.
Senator Marco Rubio, the vice chair of the Senate Select Committee overseeing intelligence that issued the report, has publicly said he wants the UFOs to be aliens and not foreign weapons. A large question, of course, is why Congress is seemingly admitting this now, in public. After all, lawmakers are privy to classified information that the general public isn't. “It strains credulity to believe that lawmakers would include such extraordinary language in public legislation without compelling evidence,” Marik von Rennenkampff, an Obama-era DoD official, said in an op-ed in The Hill about the budget. According to the op-ed, the comments were first noticed by UFO researcher Douglas Johnson.
"This implies that members of the Senate Intelligence Committee believe (on a unanimous, bipartisan basis) that some UFOs have non-human origins," von Rennenkampff continued. "After all, why would Congress establish and task a powerful new office with investigating non-'man-made' UFOs if such objects did not exist?" "Make no mistake: One branch of the American government implying that UFOs have non-human origins is an explosive development."
When the U.S. government does something, there is a reason. If they are gradually revealing a soft disclosure about aliens, they have a plan to make use of it. Social changes will be planned before, during, and after. If economic collapse eventually cannot be delayed any longer - disclosure of contact with aliens could be the fix as we get a technological boost to solve some problems and join the galactic economy. On the other hand the situation could be out of human control. Maybe the increased traffic near Earth is because the galactic wave heading our way will trigger a catastrophic pole shift in the not distant future, and alien races are debating what to do and what to save.
Congress's recent acknowledgment that not all UFOs are "man-made" and the delineation between human-origin and other-origin unidentified phenomena are seismic shifts in how the topic is being officially addressed. The language used implies a level of certainty that's been absent from governmental conversations about UFOs until now. Given this, one can't help but speculate on the underlying motives. Are they setting the stage for full disclosure, or is there a more pragmatic reason, like preparation for some impending, earth-shattering event? Either way, this soft disclosure raises more questions than it answers, hinting at a complex web of possibilities that range from technological advancement to existential threats.