Pat Buchanan Comments on "The Obama Doctrine" in the Middle East - Agrees with Obama, says Iran our new Friend

Buchanan's full Obama Doctrine article HERE

"Churchill's bust may have resided in the Oval Office of George Bush. Obama sent it back to the British Embassy. His hero is Nelson Mandela, who overthrew centuries of white rule in South Africa.

Obama is as rooted in the Third World as in the West, and his goal is to sweep out the clutter of a Cold War that "has been over a long time."

He lifted sanctions on Burma, is recognizing Castro's Cuba, and hopes to seal a nuclear deal with Iran and normalize relations.

Uninhibited by old friendships, untethered to old allies, Barack Obama is grounding his Middle East policy on what he sees as the new realities.

And the policy shifts he is making are unlikely to be reversed, for the discarding of old friends in altered circumstances is an American tradition.

In 1954, Eisenhower refused to intervene to save our French allies going down to defeat in Indochina. In 1956, he ordered the British and French out of Suez. That was the end of Prime Minister Anthony Eden, Ike's wartime friend, and of the British Empire, alongside which we had fought two world wars.

In 1963, JFK sanctioned a coup against our ally President Diem.

In 1972, Richard Nixon went to Peking to toast Chairman Mao, who was responsible for tens of thousands of U.S. war dead in Korea. Nixon thus began the severing of relations and of treaty ties with our World War II ally, Chiang Kai-shek, and his Republic of China on Taiwan.

What Ike was conceding at Suez was that the British and French empires were history and Arab nationalism was the future in the Middle East. What Nixon was conceding was that Mao's revolution was irreversible, and America must deal with the new reality.

Obama is in that tradition of ruthless American pragmatism.

Three weeks after the Arab Spring reached Cairo, he pulled the rug out from under Hosni Mubarak, an ally of 30 years. Then he welcomed the electoral triumph of the Muslim Brotherhood. Now he has accepted the coup d'etat and subsequent electoral victory of Gen. Abdel Fattah el-Sissi, and his emerging Egyptian dictatorship.

What is the new reality Obama sees across the Middle East?

It is that America's most dangerous enemies are al-Qaida and its progeny, and ISIS in Syria and Iraq. And in the war against al-Qaida and ISIS, the Ayatollah's Iran and its allies -- Hezbollah, Syria's Bashar Assad and Iraq's Shiite militias -- are on our side."

*****

Really, Pat?  Iran, Hezbollah, and Assad "are on our side"?

I think Pat may have had a little too much of that special Kool-Aid.

Buchanan continues: "Obama is not wrong here... President Obama is right to move us away from our old allies. U.S. national interests come first."

So.... Pat Buchanan apparently thinks a nuclear Iran is in America's best interests.  I didn't see that coming.

The way I see it, this is a case of bad guys vs. bad guys. Choosing sides between ISIS or Iran dominating the Middle East reminds me of the choice in 1941 between Hitler and Stalin in Eastern Europe. (Then Senator Harry Truman suggested supporting whichever side needed help so that they could kill as many of each other as possible.)

President Obama seems supportive of both ISIS and Iran, but his support of Iran seems more obvious in recent months. Since we can't see any sane reason for empowering a nation that still chants "Death to America" as we enable and legitimize their regime and nuclear program... we must ask ourselves what abnormal though process leads Obama to want a nuclear Iran.

I have a theory - and the only assumption it requires to explain Obama's policies is that Bible prophecy is true and accurate. Read - Antichrist 2016-2019: Mystery Babylon, Barack Obama & the Islamic Caliphate