Trump Won! Kamala Could Still be President Harris Soon - Here's Why

I know we've seen a flurry of activity from President Biden recently, with all his campaigning and legislating and interviews and speeches... Just kidding, he could have secretly died weeks ago for all the news coverage he's had recently. Kind of strange for a U.S. President in office.... But the democrats have been acting like Kamala Harris has been their leader for several months already, ever since Biden’s weak debate performance.

Biden has a variety of problems, from senility to policy failures to wars and rumors of war to potential indictments and convictions of many associates and family members like his son Hunter Biden - if Trump is the next president.

Is it unrealistic to think that Biden might resign before Trump takes office? The rumors before the election include this one by "Cryptographer" on GLP who suggested:

"Biden will resign shortly after the election regardless of who wins, and here are the two basic reasons why: 1) If Trump wins he will resign. This will bring Harris up into the position of POTUS and make her the first female US President, albeit a short tenure. This will help some of the left 'feel better' about the election and set into history something that can never be changed. The dems would go down in history as having the first female US President. Regardless of the fact she got it by Biden resigning, it will be a fact taught in schools well into the future. A 'win' for them. 2) If Harris wins he will resign. This will allow her to 'Immediately start working on her 'agenda' and not have to wait until January to get started'. This will push people on the right over the edge, light up the left and basically make January nothing more than a simple ceremony. A 'win' for them."

I agree Biden's resignation would benefit Harris because she can then enjoy the rest of her life as former President Harris, without being expected to accomplish anything. She can be a heroic figure to women for being America's first female president. She won't be blamed for not getting much done if she has two months or less of a lame duck presidency with Trump about to take over. While in office she can (briefly) push her own pet projects and she can pardon Joe, Hunter, and lots of other close connections to Joe - pardons that would look too shady if Joe did it himself.

A brief presidential role now even boosts her chances of running again in 2028 if she can claim she was already in the White House before and actually accomplished anything, however small, in her short time there.

If the neocons get their war with Iran they'll be very happy. If they can goad Iran into attacking U.S. forces, or stage a false flag to make it look like Iran attacked - they will. Their defense contractors will make more money, Israel will be happy, and maybe President Harris can claim a bold initial retaliatory response while solving the problem/ending the war will get get dumped on Trump.

If I were Xi Jinping and I wanted China to invade Taiwan, (most Americans don’t know how close this came to happening in September; Chinese troops were boarding ships getting ready to invade before it was called off) I would not want to wait until Trump is back in office. If China invades Taiwan soon the democrat in office has few winning moves. If President Biden doesn't get the United States directly involved in WWIII many will think he was weak or even bribed by Chinese payments to Biden family members to let China take Taiwan without American interference.

If China invades Taiwan soon and Biden does commit America to defending the democracy in Taiwan and officially starting WWIII (if the US is fighting Russia and China, it's WWIII) the democrats get blamed for being the party of wars and sending more American servicemen to their deaths in Asia.... This would make Trump into the hero that gets America out of wars democrats get started - certain to help Republicans for several future election cycles. But if China invades Taiwan and WWIII starts around mid-January under President Harris, it would not seem as outlandish to delay Trump from taking over (indefinitely) arguing the last thing America needs at the start of WWIII is the turmoil of a new administration and replacement of countless people in key positions.

And we should never underestimate what the globalists, the neocons, the elite, and the rest of the swamp that could (under President Trump in 2025) be revealed to have been involved with crimes at a Diddy party and/or Epstein Island - might do to avoid prison and to hold on to power. If WWIII does start soon (they've been working hard to get it started) that's not an unreasonable reason to impose martial law. You may have heard rumors of a newly revised Department of Defense directive allowing the military to use lethal force domestically, against Americans:

There have also been multiple rumors of an impending grid-down blackout - a planned event to shut off electricity, cell phones, internet, credit cards... and have the survivors begging their governments a month later - to do whatever it takes to restore some normalcy. Governments would of course find an enemy to blame then explain why several legal changes, losses of rights and freedoms, and a new digital currency are all necessary to keep us safe and prevent this from ever happening again. Is it that outlandish to think Trump's enemies won't do whatever it takes to avoid a transition to his second presidency if their team can stay in control to accomplish their dream goals?

I'm just saying, Biden resigning soon over declining health is not that unlikely and the democrats do have a few reasons why they would benefit from installing President Harris soon. So despite Trump's election victory - don't be surprised if Kamala Harris is the next person taking the oath of office for the presidency, and if a lot of desperate deep state criminal behavior unfolds soon.