I think I told you what initially led me to this path, which is essentially in agreement with you. If not I will share here for anyone else who may find it interesting. ( I will be very short)
I was evaluating human cognition and behavioral modernity, including concepts like Chomsky- language acquisition device ( LAD) and natural law.
Keeping the nugget that Musk mentioned about writing , and the coincidental simultaneous rise of it in numerous places after the last ice age..
What is the probability that humans after eons of evolving neural architecture developed writing in separate non connected places at relatively the same time?
After my research not only did I find this to be highly unlikely, but I can to the understanding that humans most likely have had the ability to write for hundreds of thousands of years. This is based upon the mechanisms that give is the ability to even perform such a complicated tasks. Naturally, one explanation is that writing had not become formalized and was not antifragile.. which I do indeed suspect is part of the equation..
But..
There is so much more , Musk is right there are many rabbit holes.
Since then I filtered through many things and it is clear that the space ... well... it is a narrative battleground. I have said this elsewhere, but this whole topic has more red flags than the JFK narrative.
I don't know what it all means, obviously i have speculations.. but global civilization didn't begin 6k years ago and whatever caused this interruption of the human historical timeline seems very much to be coming again in the near time horizon.
David, do you think they are going to use Musk to tell us something or is this just more noise in the aether?
As we have discussed, at this point it is probably better they don't in mass I think. ( Which is an odd change of sentiment for me)
I don't expect them to use Musk to tell us about pole shifts nor do I expect those in charge to EVER reveal what they expect to happen ahead of time. For most it will come suddenly.
I can only speculate - that the ice age topic came up on one of many interviews and he replied without revealing too much... because he knows it is forbidden to discuss all the true details known about pole shifts (Doug Vogt called this America's most important secret); yet this interview allowed him to make slightly revealing comments. There must be a certain delight in hinting at it - not exactly schadenfreude, but the joy of sharing a morsel of secret or privileged information.
I can't find a real word - English or German - for what I'm trying to describe, though Brown University has a list with some obscure joy words I think they made up including "elitnaus" - "perverse pleasure in the conviction that you are smarter than whomever you are talking to; an ego-driven feeling, spurred by erudite hubris and a little bit of elitism" ...and "irid" - "the ballooning relief of having shed a secret. Perhaps the secret was dark and looming or perhaps it was festering and starting to rot, but it was a secret which has weighed heavily upon you like a great rhinoceros on your chest, and now it is gone. It has slipped away and you feel you might start floating upwards with the sudden lack of it."
If the elite have members who know what is coming in specific detail, they might feel an occasional twinge of guilt when talking to one of their favorite people whom they like and respect - while forbidden from passing on a clear warning. By giving hints as in the clip above, perhaps some self-respect is restored, some guilt assuaged, that they have given enough clues and dropped enough bread crumbs that open-minded and intelligent seekers of truths should be able to figure it out and prepare.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. It is interesting to contemplate the psychology of such people and how they may navigate their own moral calculations. As far as Doug.. may he RIP. He was a good man that I had the pleasure of conversing with on numerous occasions.
I think I told you what initially led me to this path, which is essentially in agreement with you. If not I will share here for anyone else who may find it interesting. ( I will be very short)
I was evaluating human cognition and behavioral modernity, including concepts like Chomsky- language acquisition device ( LAD) and natural law.
Keeping the nugget that Musk mentioned about writing , and the coincidental simultaneous rise of it in numerous places after the last ice age..
What is the probability that humans after eons of evolving neural architecture developed writing in separate non connected places at relatively the same time?
After my research not only did I find this to be highly unlikely, but I can to the understanding that humans most likely have had the ability to write for hundreds of thousands of years. This is based upon the mechanisms that give is the ability to even perform such a complicated tasks. Naturally, one explanation is that writing had not become formalized and was not antifragile.. which I do indeed suspect is part of the equation..
But..
There is so much more , Musk is right there are many rabbit holes.
Since then I filtered through many things and it is clear that the space ... well... it is a narrative battleground. I have said this elsewhere, but this whole topic has more red flags than the JFK narrative.
I don't know what it all means, obviously i have speculations.. but global civilization didn't begin 6k years ago and whatever caused this interruption of the human historical timeline seems very much to be coming again in the near time horizon.
David, do you think they are going to use Musk to tell us something or is this just more noise in the aether?
As we have discussed, at this point it is probably better they don't in mass I think. ( Which is an odd change of sentiment for me)
I don't expect them to use Musk to tell us about pole shifts nor do I expect those in charge to EVER reveal what they expect to happen ahead of time. For most it will come suddenly.
Do you suspect he is just adding noise? I admit it seems the most plausible. I was surprised to see him say anything at all about it.
I can only speculate - that the ice age topic came up on one of many interviews and he replied without revealing too much... because he knows it is forbidden to discuss all the true details known about pole shifts (Doug Vogt called this America's most important secret); yet this interview allowed him to make slightly revealing comments. There must be a certain delight in hinting at it - not exactly schadenfreude, but the joy of sharing a morsel of secret or privileged information.
I can't find a real word - English or German - for what I'm trying to describe, though Brown University has a list with some obscure joy words I think they made up including "elitnaus" - "perverse pleasure in the conviction that you are smarter than whomever you are talking to; an ego-driven feeling, spurred by erudite hubris and a little bit of elitism" ...and "irid" - "the ballooning relief of having shed a secret. Perhaps the secret was dark and looming or perhaps it was festering and starting to rot, but it was a secret which has weighed heavily upon you like a great rhinoceros on your chest, and now it is gone. It has slipped away and you feel you might start floating upwards with the sudden lack of it."
If the elite have members who know what is coming in specific detail, they might feel an occasional twinge of guilt when talking to one of their favorite people whom they like and respect - while forbidden from passing on a clear warning. By giving hints as in the clip above, perhaps some self-respect is restored, some guilt assuaged, that they have given enough clues and dropped enough bread crumbs that open-minded and intelligent seekers of truths should be able to figure it out and prepare.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. It is interesting to contemplate the psychology of such people and how they may navigate their own moral calculations. As far as Doug.. may he RIP. He was a good man that I had the pleasure of conversing with on numerous occasions.